Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Singapore tales : Dispelling myths, or How easy it is to model the title of an article after popular cinema

"Spotless roads"

Fib, fib, fib. If anything, these people are just as untidy as we are! In fact, when I hear people rhapsodise on the cleanliness that marks public places in Singapore(or other glamorous tourist destinations, for that matter), combined with imprecations hurled at foreigners for their generally opulent lifestyles, I find it hard to believe that such instances of modern decadence could co-exist with social responsibility. I mean, where is the inevitable crack in the veneer?

It appears it is time to lift the wool off our eyes. The roads are good, hard, straight, level.... but what is that on the sidewalks? Why, the refuse of a generation bred on fast-eats and polythene. In fact, I can see why we return to India under the above quoted delusion. The roads are just too well-maintained, wide, spacious, lined with lush vegetation -- that is something I really appreciate...concrete jungle notwithstanding, empty spaces are promptly pounced upon and grass/bushes/trees soon occupy pride of place, even on large avenues --... no wonder all the trash is barely visible. Ok, the overflowing bins and trash heaps, populated by bipeds, tripeds and quadrupeds alike, are not to be seen. So they have a good disposal system. Up theirs!

And the rumours that hefty fines are imposed on public offenders in this regard, are just those...rumours. Of course, administrative buildings, monuments etc do enforce strict laws...

And the fines! Smoking on elevators carries a penalty of $1000, and within buildings(obviously air-conditioned) or stations...$5000. So, thankfully, the perennial cloud of smoke is not a pemanent fixture at public congregations. Of course, the downside is that to sneak a smoke, people ensconce themselves in toilets, for instance, so that these are thick with the noxious fumes.

"People speak excellent English"

Have I disembarked at the wrong nation, perhaps? Tourist guides proclaim that English is virtually the national language, but I see little evidence of that on display. What with the harsh and 'angular' accents, attributable to the jagged Mandarin tongue, presumably, and the weird intonations, again Mandarin, perhaps, one is frequently at a loss in simple conversations, and the latter quality means half the syllables make their way into the anterior of the speaker's system, rather than without. Hence, imagine having every other word absent, and the remaining accentuated to resemble the undulations of a Scottish landscape.... tough indeed.

Not to sound unbearably haughty, but I find Indians light years better, in this respect. Gone are the unplaceable accents(mostly), and most of the missing prepositions are reinstated too, though perhaps not in their rightful places, but then you can't have everything. Then again, this is just my opinion.

"People are courteous and helpful"

Maybe I'll agree with that by and by, when the claim is modified to read:
"People are courteous and helpful... at the sight of the $ sign".
Now, this is not very unreasonable, but as a tourist hotspot, and a nation that is super-efficient at marketing its few attractions, I would have hoped for more smiles and fewer dour glances. Anyway, taking into account the deafness quotient prevalent among people, and the language barriers, maybe it isn't all that surprising. Also, I learnt that most of those into public services(taxi drivers, shopkeepers) are financially strained as well. Don't blame them. With higher buying power come higher rates as well. But I did notice that even a car mechanic, and the institute plumbers cleaning a clogged drain are very decently dressed. Now is that to imply that we, as a people, are indifferent to our appearances, and consequently, shoddlily attired? Perhaps.

There are exceptions to the courteousness observation. For instance, a very nice old lady at the airport was so helpful as to chart out my entire journey to the institute, reel off a list of places to see and things to do, advise me on the cheapest way to travel around, and flash a warm smile in the end.

"Things are shamefully costly"

That is not true at all. In fact, a round of the supermarket taught me that prices are pretty much comparable to those back home, with minor allowances. For instance, juices and milk tetrapacks are available at 50 cents(~14 rs) which is reasonable. Shampoos are available for SGD 3-3.50(~80-90 Rs), and the usual reputed brands too. Clothes can be purchased at SGD 6-8 for a pair of jeans, which is very reassuring! And to be very honest, a decent meal costs about SGD 1.50-2, which comes to around Rs 40-60. Why, cheap eateries in Chennai work out to about that much too.

The amount of variety on hand is astounding. You could simply stroll around in department stores, ogling at products of myriad shapes, utilities and prices, much as one browses in a book-shop. I have come to enjoy that quite a bit.... :)

Of course, you could splash inordinate quantities of cash around, and not gain much in the way of quality, unlike at home, and maybe those ultra-cheap and impossibly tempting roadside joints scattered all over mana Bharat may not abound here, but I am yet to explore the place fully.

All in all, there have been some delightful discoveries I have made(call them perverse pleasures), such as


  • toilets here are not clean enough to eat off, as depicted in movies
  • Complexions are not uniformly flawless, clear and radiant. Pimply countenances and melanin-deposits are dime-a-dozen.
  • Bus seats do have chewing gum stuck to the seat bottoms
  • A dirty rivulet trickles its way through the middle of a busy city centre, right at the entrance to "Little India"
  • Having no significant cultural history to trumpet, much ado is made about the daft Merlion, and "heritage spots" like Lord Raffles(a British bloke who signed treaties with Muslim rulers in early 1800s to permit the operations of the East India Company) landing spot, "Chinatown" and of course, "Little India", which might be termed "A Little pinch of India, a dollop of Singapore" for all I care.

and so on...(still discovering)

10 comments:

Vaishali said...

well , we indians never 'update' our knowledge on the present situation of a place. so if a thing is 'clean and neat' a 25 years back , we still think it is so , today , oblivious of the garbage ,perhaps. (like how people think that bangalore has the 'perfect climate' , but only the people who actually experience the so-called blissful climate actually know!)

-
jvpoirot

N said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
N said...

looks like shattered illusions all the way!

indian roads better than singapore ones?? macha are you serious?
get a feeling you are too patriotic to come to terms with the truth! :D

and doesn't your blog vandi have a brake?
10 posts within a week! whoa!

conclusions -
1)too much free time. or
2)too less cash to spend travelling. or
3)too old to rock and roll, too young to die.. or
4) all of the above!


you can thank me later for starting you off with blaghing.

Kumar said...

Naresh:
Do read carefully. I said the quality of the road-laying is incredible in Singapore, but it isn't fact that they approach godliness, by virtue of cleanliness.

Now, as for you, looks like you have run out of ideas in the very first week, on your blog. Are you

a) too busy 'leching'
b) too busy 'swilling'
c) too busy gathering more info on "shakeela"
d) sufering from stomach upset, thanks to a diet of mainly vada-pav
e) none of the above, just too colourless

And yes, give me India any day. And no, not quite broke yet.

N said...

i was kinda busy doing almost all those things that you mentioned.

and more.

come to bombay in the rains and you would probably appreciate singapore roads better! :)

N said...

i remember catching a glimpse of citizen kane poster and how you were bored by it in one of your blog posts.
but you seemed to have deleted it!
why?

Kumar said...

Actually, Singapore is almost too much of a good thing, if you know what I mean. I don't desire such smooth public machinery.

And about Citizen Kane, I WAS bored by it, but realized the post itself was pretty mediocre, besides being unremittingly bitter. And I don't much care for critical opinions on cinema anymore, so.....

N said...

"dont much care for critical opinions on cinema"

seen 'em all eh?
if you have, you should put all that effort to some use. go the roger ebert way. thumbs up, thumbs down kinda thingy.

if you haven't, you should definitely care for the reviews, for you might have missed out on something thats good.

and why citizen kane of all movies?
i'm this die hard fan of welles, so would like to hear about it from you...

i'm straying away from the topic of the post. so i'll stop.

Kumar said...

Citizen kane. Excellent film da, very well made and all, some nice photography, but rather tired stuff. Also, poorly paced, with a breathless first two-thirds and a sluggish final act. It looks like Welles devoted the early passages to his experiments, and then realized his character was sketchy at best, so slowed down. Still maybe the giddy acclaim it has received makes me overly critical, but that's the way it is.
Gotta love Wilder tho.

Anonymous said...

Looking for information and found it at this great site... Linksys router software download rating accounting software Weight didrex laser eye surgery ritalin drug James bond aston martin db5